In the worst-case scenario, our legal system is designed in such a way that any exemption regime is free, and it is guaranteed that it has the opportunity to respond to the accusations of others before an episode occurs. These attributes prevent a group from applying its own agreement and instead require an external person. B, for example, a judge or arbitrator, participates in dispute resolution and oversees the enforcement process. There is considerable debate as to whether public (judges/jury) or private (referee) systems are more effective. Most tic agreements are based on mandatory arbitration, usually faster, but just as (or even more expensive) than going to court. But one of the main attributes of a good ICT agreement is its effectiveness in avoiding the need for dispute resolution and the maintenance of most of the enforcement process at the hands of a judge or arbitrator. While the frequency of ICT group failures is extremely low, the potential consequences are serious, particularly in today`s world of falling real estate values and in a difficult sales and refinancing environment. Nevertheless, the standard procedure in ICT agreements has remained virtually unchanged over the past 20 years. Our next-generation ICT agreements take a completely new approach that makes the process of abandoning a failing owner simpler, faster and less costly. This new approach focuses on eliminating the need for mediation or arbitration when default involves non-payment of valuations. Similarly, all stages of our new forced sale procedure can be processed internally according to the standard, without the failed owner being forced to sign documents or otherwise participate in the sale process. This amendment makes it unnecessary for a court or arbitrator to be permanently or repeatedly involved in the forced sale process.
An ICT owner is responsible for the share of the tic obligations described in the ICT contract. Personal responsibility is then a matter of each co-owner`s business structure. If z.B. a party forms a single-use LLC to hold the ICT shares, the personal liability of the LLC owner is limited to the value of THE ICT shares of LLC. No treatment of the condominium as a unit. The condominium may not file a corporate or corporate tax return, conduct transactions under a common name, execute an agreement identifying either co-owner as a partner, shareholder or member of a business entity, or otherwise assert itself as a corporation or other commercial entity. Similarly, co-owners cannot assert themselves as partners, shareholders or members of an entity. While ICT owners are generally concerned with turning their property into condos once they are qualified, there are more and more incidents where an owner tries to delay the conversion for financial reasons. While this type of delay is contrary to the provisions of most ICT agreements, owners trying to move the transformation process forward have complained about the difficulty of implementing these provisions.